#Keyshot rendering extremely slow driver#
#Keyshot rendering extremely slow software#

#Keyshot rendering extremely slow driver#

Unfortunately, a bug with the review GPU driver prevented Luxion’s KeyShot from being tested, so when a new driver comes out, we’ll get that tested and added in.Īs we did with the 4090 launch article, let’s start with V-Ray:Īs we saw in the Cycles tests, Ada Lovelace offers huge gains over the Ampere generation, just as Ampere did over Turing.

#Keyshot rendering extremely slow software#

Our look at rendering performance for NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4080 will be revolving around six software solutions – or seven, if you count Blender as two, as both Cycles and Eevee are tested. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 (8GB GeForce 516.94)Īll product links in this table are affiliated, and help support our work. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 (12GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (8GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (8GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (8GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (10GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (12GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 (24GB GeForce 516.94) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (16GB GeForce 526.72)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (24GB GeForce 521.90) For now, here’s the test rig we used for all of our benchmarking, followed by the test results (we’ll post another article looking at encoding, photogrammetry, math, and viewport performance soon).ĪMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (16GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (16GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6800 (16GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6600 (8GB Adrenalin 22.9.1)ĪMD Radeon RX 6500 XT (4GB Adrenalin 22.9.1) We’ll leave more discussion to the conclusion. That all said, we talk about that from an overall standpoint, but in rendering, even if NVIDIA commands a notable price premium, chances are that the performance per dollar is still going to be in the green team’s favor – something our many rendering performance graphs here will highlight. If AMD’s top next-gen card is competitive, we might see RTX 4080 pricing sway a bit. NVIDIA could have no doubt launched the RTX 4080 at $999 and given AMD’s upcoming Radeon RX 7900 XTX a serious fight at the same price-point, because the price gap between both top GPUs in the current GeForce lineup just doesn’t follow what we’ve seen in the past. The RTX 4090 costs 33% more than the RTX 4080, but includes 50% more memory, 41% more bandwidth, and 68% more cores. How NVIDIA priced this generation so far is worthy of discussion, because many could assume that the company has decided to structure things in such a way that it encourages anyone to consider opting for the top chip. RTX 3000 = Ampere RTX 4000 = Ada Lovelace NVIDIA’s GeForce Gaming & Creator GPU Lineup That leaves us with two total models gracing the current Ada Lovelace lineup: Since that announcement, NVIDIA unlaunched the RTX 4080 12GB, and is expected to relaunch it later as a different model. You might recall that the Ada Lovelace generation launched with three models. A larger size means that smaller mid-towers will not be sufficient enough to hold the card, but if you can fit it in, it will deliver strong performance and decently quiet operation (and temperatures) given its large cooler. Well, that’d be assuming wrong, as the RTX 4080 is about the same size as the RTX 3090. With a name like RTX 4080, it might be easy to assume that it’d be a dual-slot design like every other X080 GPU – leaving the top-end X090 cards to go three-slot.